Roundtable #10

"Riparian Buffers: Impacts on Phosphorus and Sediment Control"

 


October 30, 2002 "Riparian Buffers: Impacts on Phosphorus and Sediment Control"

October 30, 2002 Roundtable Minutes

 

Conclusions & Resolutions

  • Buffers are complex and not a water quality panacea.

  • Sediment and nutrient management needs to be a series of controls
    -Must consider up-slope control practices as well.

  • For sediment control, length of buffer may not be the most important
    -Other factors: grass characteristics, buffer maintenance, effective ponding behind buffer, etc.

  • For control of nutrients, length and infiltration capacity of the buffer is important.

  • Buffer characteristics must be matched to landscape conditions, farming systems, needs of the water body being protected.

  • Need to examine source-control practices (i.e. agricultural management practices) as well as remedial practices to control sediment and phosphorus losses.

Issues to Resolve

  • Need "systems" buffer research - not "single component" research.
    -Systems research needs to be conducted at various spatial and temporal scales.

  • Buffer design difficulties and the inconsistent literature base.

  • Purpose of buffers.
    -Sediment control,
    -Nutrient control (N, P, both),
    -Aesthetics,
    -Pesticide control,
    -Chemical control,
    -Pathogen control,
    -Etc.

  • Loss of productive agricultural land with the wide-spread installation of buffers.
    -Particular concern in Wisconsin's western, driftless area

  • Will any general/universal design criteria for buffers ever be developed?

  • Need limnologist input on the whole buffer issue.

  • Must maintain realistic expectations of the conclusions that can be drawn from the buffer research agenda.


Research & Information Needs

Note: The following list is not prioritized!

  • Examine the change in buffer effectiveness over time.

  • Identification of areas where buffers are not effective.

  • Explore the impact of climate (particularly northern climate) on buffer effectiveness and durability.
    -Snowmelt release of P
    -Vegetation release of P

  • Define the maintenance requirements for buffers
    -These will vary seasonally

  • Identify upland management practices that will allow for maximum buffer effectiveness.

  • Examine the economic impact of buffers.
    -Explore positives and negatives.
    -Are there vegetative species that can be used in buffers that will have an agricultural benefit?

  • Identify landowner constraints to the installation of buffers.

  • Investigate and define site-specific influences on buffer design characteristics.
    -Slope, soil type, cropland practices, etc.

  • Determine the appropriate vegetation species for maximum buffer effectiveness.
    -Balance with agricultural benefit.

  • Explore alternative buffer designs.
    -Vertical characteristics rather than horizontal characteristics
    -Grass height and "dimples", berms within buffers, etc.

  • Develop methods for controlling or managing the impact of large episodic events (storms) on buffer "failure".

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of a single, contiguous buffer verses a series of buffers.

  • Determine the secondary benefits of buffers.
    -Wildlife, fish, aesthetics
    -Impact of these other benefits on buffer design

  • Develop methods for determining buffer effectiveness (or ineffectiveness).

  • Develop a ranking tool for buffer position on the landscape.
    -Maximize effectiveness, minimize cost

  • Conduct in-field studies utilizing natural rainfall in addition to simulated rainfall studies.

  • Evaluate natural buffers (grass, trees, brush) versus grass buffers.

 

Roundtable Archives

Roundtable Schedule

Research & information needs

Vision

Who We are

Give us feedback

Home


Nutrient Management
Self-Directed Team
If you have difficulty reading any of these pages please contact ssturgul@facstaff.wisc.edu